FAQ

Public searches and basic verification features may be available without registration. An account may be required to: request an audit; submit or manage reports; access private reports; use monitoring services; manage certificates; purchase paid services.

The required information may include: name; email address; company information; billing details; account credentials; identity or authority verification for selected services. The exact requirements depend on the service used.

Personal data is processed according to the Aulisco Privacy Policy and applicable data-protection laws. Aulisco applies appropriate technical and organizational measures, but no online system can guarantee absolute security.

Not necessarily. Some information may remain confidential, be redacted or be used only for verification. Public records should display only information considered relevant, lawful and proportionate.

Yes. Users may request account closure, subject to: legal retention requirements; ongoing disputes; fraud-prevention obligations; unpaid services; contractual commitments; records that Aulisco is legally entitled or required to retain.

Depending on the selected service, Aulisco may provide: company and organizational audits; financial and operational risk assessments; website and domain verification; cybersecurity assessments; source-code reviews; smart-contract audits; blockchain and wallet analysis; token assessments; compliance reviews; governance and transparency assessments; continuous monitoring services. The exact scope is defined before the audit begins.

An audit generally includes: definition of the audit scope; collection of documents and technical information; public-source and regulatory research; technical and operational verification; analysis of identified risks; calculation of relevant scores; preparation of findings and recommendations; publication or private delivery of the report, depending on the service. Additional checks may be required when information is incomplete or inconsistent.

The duration depends on the audit type, complexity, available documentation and level of access provided by the client. A basic verification may require less time than a complete financial, technical and compliance audit. The expected timeline is normally defined before the engagement begins.

No. Payment covers the audit work and does not guarantee a positive score, certificate, approval or favourable report. Audit conclusions must reflect the evidence and findings identified during the assessment.

An audit may identify serious weaknesses, missing information, inconsistencies, regulatory concerns or technical vulnerabilities. In such cases, Aulisco may: issue a low score; classify the audit as incomplete; request corrective action; suspend the assessment; refuse certification; publish unresolved findings where contractually and legally permitted.

Yes. Where appropriate, the audited entity may be allowed to correct identified issues and request a reassessment. The original findings may remain part of the audit history where necessary for transparency.

Aulisco audits provide independent professional analysis within the agreed scope. They do not automatically replace audits, certifications, legal opinions or regulatory assessments required by law. Users should consult qualified professionals where formal legal, accounting or regulatory certification is required.

The Aulisco Score is a structured indicator designed to represent the level of reliability, transparency, compliance and risk identified during an assessment. It may consider factors such as: verified company information; regulatory records; technical security; governance; transparency; operational history; public warnings; unresolved incidents; monitoring results.

No. The score is an analytical indicator based on available information at a specific time. It does not guarantee that an organization, website, token, wallet, smart contract or investment is safe.

Yes. A score may change when: new information becomes available; a company corrects identified problems; new vulnerabilities are discovered; a regulatory warning is issued; the monitored system changes; previous information is found to be inaccurate; continuous monitoring identifies a relevant event.

Each score is based on the evidence, risks and circumstances associated with the specific entity. Differences may result from: regulatory status; company history; documentation quality; technical security; transparency; governance; unresolved complaints; audit cooperation; operational risk.

The Aulisco Blacklist is a structured risk registry containing information about organizations, websites, wallets, tokens, platforms or projects associated with documented warnings, technical findings, enforcement actions or substantiated reports.

No. A listing does not automatically mean that a person or organization has committed a criminal offence. Each record must be interpreted according to its source, status and evidence level.

Records may include: official regulatory warnings; sanctions; public enforcement actions; court or administrative records; verified technical findings; documented cybersecurity incidents; substantiated user reports; records under review; disputed records; resolved or archived cases.

Users may be permitted to submit reports through the Submit Report section. Reports should include accurate information and supporting evidence. False, defamatory, retaliatory or fabricated reports are prohibited.

No. Aulisco may review, reject, redact, classify, archive or request further evidence before publication. Submission does not guarantee publication.

Yes. An identified person or organization may request: correction of inaccurate information; inclusion of a formal response; review of the record; reassessment of the classification; removal where legally required; updating of a resolved case. Supporting documents may be required.

A record may be corrected, restricted, archived or removed where appropriate. Removal is not automatic and depends on factors such as: accuracy; legal basis; source reliability; public-interest relevance; resolution of the underlying issue; applicable data-protection and publication rules.

"Under Review" means that information has been received but has not yet been fully confirmed or classified. Users should not treat an under-review record as a final finding.

This classification indicates that a competent authority has published a warning, notice, sanction or similar official record concerning the identified entity. The source should be displayed or referenced in the relevant record.

Continuous monitoring is an optional service that performs periodic, random or event-triggered checks after the initial audit. Its purpose is to identify changes that may affect the validity of a score or audit result.

Depending on the service, monitoring may include: website changes; domain status; regulatory notices; sanctions and public warnings; smart-contract changes; code changes; security incidents; company-record changes; licence status; blockchain activity; new risk reports.

No. Monitoring depends on available data, technical access, public sources and third-party systems. Aulisco does not guarantee immediate detection of every incident or change.

Aulisco is an audit, compliance and risk-intelligence platform designed to analyse organizations, websites, digital projects, financial services, blockchain systems, wallets, tokens, smart contracts and software. It combines public-source intelligence, technical analysis, structured audit methodologies, monitoring and human review.

Aulisco represents: A - Audit U - Universal LI - Live Intelligence S - Score CO - Compliance The name reflects the platform's objective of providing universal, continuously updated audit and compliance intelligence.

Aulisco may be used by: companies; investors; compliance professionals; legal and investigative professionals; cybersecurity teams; financial and crypto professionals; blockchain projects; software companies; consumers carrying out due diligence. Some services may require registration, identity verification or a paid audit engagement.

No. Aulisco is an independent private audit and risk-intelligence platform. It is not a regulator, court, law-enforcement authority, bank, investment adviser or government agency. Aulisco reports do not constitute regulatory approval.

Some search, verification or public-information functions may be available without charge. Audits, detailed reports, monitoring and professional services may require payment.

Prices may depend on: audit type; company size; technical complexity; number of systems or assets; required documentation; monitoring period; urgency; level of human analysis. A quotation or service description should be provided before paid work begins.

Refund eligibility depends on the purchased service, work already performed and applicable law. Fees for professional work already started or completed are normally non-refundable unless otherwise agreed or legally required.

Recurring services may be cancelled before the next renewal date through the account area or by contacting support. Cancellation normally stops future renewals but does not retroactively refund completed billing periods.

A useful report may include: name of the organization or person; website or domain; wallet address; transaction identifiers; contact information used; relevant dates; description of events; contracts; emails or messages; screenshots; payment evidence; regulatory references; supporting documents. Only relevant and lawfully obtained information should be submitted.

Anonymous submissions may be allowed, depending on the service configuration. However, reports supported by verifiable contact information and evidence may be easier to investigate. Reporter information is not automatically published.

No. Aulisco may document, analyse and classify reported events, but it is not a debt-collection service and cannot guarantee recovery of lost funds. Users affected by suspected fraud should also consider contacting: their bank or payment provider; the relevant exchange; local law enforcement; financial regulators; a qualified lawyer.

Aulisco may contact an identified organization to request clarification, supporting documents or a formal response. This depends on the record type, available evidence, legal requirements and review process.

Use the Services or Contact section and provide: organization or project name; website; requested audit type; relevant systems or blockchain networks; preferred timeline; contact details. Aulisco may request additional information before confirming the scope.

Use the Contact or record-review procedure and include: the relevant record or URL; the information considered incorrect; the requested correction; supporting evidence; proof of authority where acting for an organization.

Use the official Contact page available on: aulisco.com For security reasons, users should rely only on contact information published on the official Aulisco website.

Yes, where included in the selected service. A smart-contract audit may examine: source code; access controls; token mechanics; permissions; upgradeability; known vulnerabilities; external dependencies; administrative privileges; deployment configuration.

No. An audit reduces risk by identifying known or observable issues within the agreed scope. It cannot guarantee that no vulnerability exists or that future changes will remain secure.

Yes. Depending on supported networks and available data, wallet analysis may include: transaction history; counterparties; exposure to identified risks; suspicious movement patterns; sanctions-related indicators; interactions with known contracts; source and destination analysis. Wallet analysis does not automatically establish the identity or intent of the wallet owner.

Aulisco may use automated systems to collect and analyse public website information. Automated findings may be reviewed by human analysts where necessary.

Aulisco may use automated and artificial-intelligence-assisted systems to process information, detect patterns and support analysts. Important findings should not rely exclusively on automated conclusions where human review is necessary.

Use the Verify Audit section and enter the audit code, certificate number or verification identifier shown on the report or badge. The verification result may display: audited entity; audit type; issue date; expiry date; current status; score; certificate validity; suspension or withdrawal notices.

An invalid result may mean that: the code is incorrect; the certificate does not exist; the certificate has expired; the audit has been suspended; the report has been withdrawn; the document has been altered; the badge is being used without authorization.

Yes. A certificate may be suspended or revoked if: it was obtained using false or incomplete information; material circumstances changed; serious new risks were discovered; the badge was misused; monitoring requirements were not respected; the audited entity violated the applicable agreement.